Class Debates in Intermediate Microeconomics: Social Economics and Pluralist Perspectives
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Econ 121b: Intermediate Microeconomics
While the idea of a matching pennies game may seem contrived, it is merely the simplest example of a general class of zero-sum games, where the total payoff of the players is constant regardless of the outcome. Consequently gains for one player can only come from losses of the other. For this reason, zero-sum games will rarely have a pure strategy Nash equilibrium. Examples would be chess, or m...
متن کاملHistory of Thought and Methodology in Pluralist Economics Education
The purpose of the paper is to develop the argument that history of thought and methodology should form part of the content of pluralist teaching in economics, where the aim of this teaching is taken to equip students to exercise their own judgement as economists. Discussion of the nature and scope of economics, with examples from history, helps students understand what is involved in consideri...
متن کاملDetecting Perspectives in Political Debates
We explore how to detect people’s perspectives that occupy a certain proposition. We propose a Bayesian modelling approach where topics (or propositions) and their associated perspectives (or viewpoints) are modeled as latent variables. Words associated with topics or perspectives follow different generative routes. Based on the extracted perspectives, we can extract the top associated sentence...
متن کاملLatin American Development: Perspectives and Debates
One of the recurring topics in Latin American debates refers to the dynamics of accumulation and the current models of development. Critical categories such as Extractivism or Neoextractivism, as well as pro-positive ones like Buen Vivir, Common Goods, Rights of Nature, Post-extractivism, among others, traverse social struggles and debates, and are generating a new political grammar that questi...
متن کاملArgument Mining and Social Debates
With this demonstration we introduce AFAlpha, a prototype of an Argument Mining tool, working in unison with Quaestio-it, an online social debating platform. While AFAlpha extracts arguments from text, as well as attack and support relations between arguments, Quaestio-it is concerned with visualising and evaluating interactive debates. We thus use Quaestio-it to represent and visualise output ...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Forum for Social Economics
سال: 2018
ISSN: 0736-0932,1874-6381
DOI: 10.1080/07360932.2018.1447494